I consider myself a technologically sound person. My DVD/VCR does not blink “12:00 AM” all day and night. I can find my way around a computer without studying manuals thicker than the Atlanta phone book. I can load tunes onto my mp3 player without screaming and throwing things around the room. I confess, though, that last thing is amazingly simple if you don’t have to fight with iTunes . . .
Recently, I have had several people tell me that it is time I bought myself some sort of e-reader. “You need a Kindle,” they tell me. “You need to buy a Nook!” I freely admit I like the notion of an e-reader. I like the idea that I could have some sort of device that has 3500 books stored on it, just waiting patiently for me to flip it on, tap a key or two, and start reading. I love the idea that you can get classic pieces of literature that are no longer in copyright for free. The notion of having a gadget in my hand, loaded with a library of Verne, Shakespeare, Poe, Wells, and the like, makes me smile to even dream about.
But there is one fatal flaw in the plan. I love books.
I love the way a book feels in my hands. I love the aroma of paper and ink that comes up from the pages when you open a book for the first time. I cannot imagine getting the same feeling from turning on a “Nintendo Book Boy” and settling into a comfortable chair for a few hours. The power and majesty of the printed word on paper is just a unique thing.
There are books I treasure. I read “To Kill a Mockingbird” at least four times a year. Every time I read the first line of the book, “When he was nearly thirteen my brother Jem got his arm badly broken at the elbow,” I find myself smiling. Harper Lee starts her classic story with a statement that, on the surface, seems to be just that, a statement. The entire story, as we find out, leads to that one simple statement. From there to the last words of the book, “Atticus would be there all night, and he would be there when Jem waked up in the morning…”, every line is like a lyric in a song about the South. The song is not always a pretty one, but it is a beautiful one.
I keep a paperback copy of “Mockingbird” tucked into a pocket of every travel bag I own. I have a fear of being stuck somewhere and having nothing to read. Call it my “security blanket,” but I feel better knowing that, for whatever reason, if I need a calming, quieting hour or two, I can dig out that book and lose myself in the story of Scout, Jem, Atticus, and Tom Robinson.
As I think about my love of books, so many things jump out in my mind. I am a voracious reader and a self-taught speed reader, but I came onto certain books in odd ways. I did not find Tolkien and “The Lord of the Rings” until college. A good friend of mine, David Broshar, started talking about the book during a conversation about Stephen King’s “The Stand.” I mentioned that “The Stand” fascinated me because King, in essence, creates a world, destroys it, and rebuilds it. David leaned back in his chair, pulled out his trusty can of Copenhagen, and said, “You should read ‘The Lord of the Rings.’ Tolkien created a universe, not just a world.” A professional bass fisherman could not have set a hook better.
I stumbled onto Pat Conroy in high school, because someone told me that there was a copy of “The Lords of Discipline” in the library but they were “not allowed to put it out on the shelf” because it was too “controversial.” Well, that settled that quickly enough. I had to read that book. I did not expect to be shocked by anything in the plot. Any book that some school system feels needs to be “banned” is usually better in style and substance than the ones they have no problem offering up on the shelves. What I did find, though, was an author that inspired me to learn how to write myself. The story he told was impressive, but his sentences, his fluidity and descriptive style, they took me to the streets of Charleston, South Carolina, to the frightening nights suffered by a plebe cadet at a Southern military institute, to the salt marshes of the Lowcountry. Again, I was hooked.
My love of movies took me to “Moby Dick” and “The Count of Monte Cristo.” I found Dashiell Hammett, Raymond Chandler, and Ernest Hemingway because of Bogart movies. Lon Chaney, Sr. took me to Leroux and Hugo. I was pleasantly surprised to find how much the film version of “Gone With The Wind” had cut out of the book.
And, in every case, I found the pleasure of holding the book in my hand, feeling the slightly-yellowed pages in my fingers as I turned each one, diving deeper into the story. The aroma of aged paper and glue was like perfume, and, like any male, I followed the perfume until I found the beauty wearing it.
I just glanced over at the book I keep, and have kept, at my bedside for years now. It’s a leatherbound volume of the collected works of Jules Verne. I found it in an antique book store almost twenty years ago. Verne had been another fascination of mine since I had first seen the movie version of “Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea.” The idea that one man, through the power of the pen, had basically invented what is now known as “science fiction” grabbed me and it has never let go. One man’s mind had the forethought to predict such things as traveling to the moon in a rocket fired from Earth, an “atomic” submarine, diving equipment, underwater eco-farming, and countless other ideas that are now accepted as reality. His “The Mysterious Island” was one of the first books to create a microcosm of society and show it thriving through non-prejudicial teamwork. His work has inspired writers, scientists, filmmakers, and explorers for over a century. And this happened through books, not a hand-held video screen with a few buttons on it and a nice little carrying case. It happened through the ink touching the page, and the page being bound to another.
I write now because I like the feeling of creating worlds. I can put words into the mouths of characters I create, and have them say things I want them to say. I can tell stories the way I have always wanted to. And other people can read them, think about them, and maybe those words will, in some way, let someone else find the desire to do the same thing with their words.
I write because I love books. I love books because I write. But I also love books because they are permanent. They are testimony that other people create, and offer their creations to the world. They inspire, they calm, and they take the reader wherever they want to go. They let people dream. They let people escape. And they let people return to them time and time again, to relive those dreams, to find that same escape.
You cannot get the same experience, reading from the bits and bytes of the sterile cyber-library stored on some device or gadget. There is something magical about opening a book, hearing the binding pop quietly as it is first spread wide enough to hold. The weight of the story resting in the right hand, the left hand waiting to take on the load of the pages as the story unfolds. And, again, that perfume . . . that aroma of paper and ink wafts up from the pages, beckoning to the reader to stick around a while and enjoy what is in store. The sound of the page rustling as it is turned, and the gentle shift of the fingers as the reader tucks the last page away and starts on the next one.
When the book is finished, there is a satisfaction in closing that book, that gentle slam as the last page is finished and the cover is closed. And, if you’re like me, you take a moment to let the last words repeat in your mind, savoring them one last time before you put the book on the shelf, the bedside table, or the side table next to your chair. And you sigh and say a silent thank you to the author for allowing you to share in that story.
There is no device, no machine, that can capture that magic…
11 responses to “Turn the page…”
Roby Richardson
September 13th, 2010 at 06:50
Well siad, Cap’n.
Wish I’d known your attachment to Lords of Dicipline from the Duckworth library. A few years back, we might have been able to arrange a lttle “rescue.” That is how Mary got her copy of “The Boo.” lol
Weird, I had this conversation w/ someone the other day. Glad to read that I am not the only one that feels this way.
I’ve taught “To Kill a Mockingbird” several times in my 9th Lit classes. It amazes me how in a society where kids wouldn’t read a book if it was deep fried and covered in chocolate, this book is always a big ht. They love it and more than once, began to openly cheer for the characters towards the end.
Best blog yet, bubba
clay perry
September 13th, 2010 at 07:51
i picked up fellowship of the ring last night & started reading it again… one of my favorite sounds is the turning of a page.
Steve Davenport
September 13th, 2010 at 10:25
Somehow I knew where this blog entry was going from the very beginning. We’re definitely kindred spirits. I like the idea of an e-reader but just can’t seem to wrap myself around it…
Mike Patterson
September 13th, 2010 at 13:19
I guess it must be a nostalgia thing. You obviously have an overwhelmingly positive psychological association with the form of paper books. Not so for me…
I’ve been a voracious reader since I was 6 years old. I spent much of my childhood perched in the top of a tree with a book, because that was the best way to get people to leave me alone and let me read.
I couldn’t even begin to estimate how many paperback books I’ve accidentally destroyed or lost over the years. I literally traveled the world with them – loving the content but hating the impracticality of the medium.
About 4 years ago I bought a phone that could read text files, and I’ve never looked back. Being able to read whatever I wish at a moment’s notice without having to carry a fragile paper book around has completely changed my reading life. Now my books don’t tear or smudge, my fingers don’t get black stains, spines don’t break, they don’t yellow or get mold spots with age, and I don’t forget where I left them – because my phone goes everywhere with me.
When I read before turning out the light…wait…I go ahead and turn out the light! Now I read until I turn off the book. (Which doubles as a handy flashlight in the middle of the night on the way to the restroom – invaluable in a strange hotel room.)
I no longer have to sit up in bed with a book on my lap to read, instead I lay down comfortably and hold my lightweight phone in one hand until I press the “off” button and set it on the nightstand.
The only thing I prefer to read in paper form these days is my collection of Calvin and Hobbes books. Those just don’t come across well in e-form.
As I write this I have about 400 paper books in boxes in my office closet and basement. These are the remnants of my paper collection – the ones I couldn’t bear to part company with and haven’t been able to find in electronic form yet.
As I find electronic copies, the paper ones go to Goodwill, which I expect will be the ultimate fate of most of them except for a very special few such as some of the first books I owned as a child, some books that will NEVER make it to electronic form (unless I scan them myself) and some First Editions.
I thank you for the poetry in your prose, but I expect you’ll need to print it out to really enjoy it…
Shannon White Hardin
September 13th, 2010 at 20:54
I just can’t see myself ever using an e-reader. hell, I feel like I’m cheating on my books when I listen to an audiobook in my car or on my i-pod; and even then I only do it when I simply cannot pick up a book and read – driving, running, etc. I too love the feel of the book, the smell, the way the pages align in the spine, the way the type dances on the page.
I especially love the romantic notion that movies brought you to books – I hadn’t considered that but in so many ways it’s true. I loved Holly Golightly in the movies long before I met Truman Capote’s Holly of the novel; and boy howdy did I fall for her! head over heels! like nothing you’ve ever seen – hard, I tell you! so yeah, I totally get that.
but I will challenge (?) you a tad on one of your thoughts: the last one – “There is no device, no machine, that can capture that magic…” well, if movies brought you to books, so you must also admit that there is a magic in those movies all to itself. I would never suggest that any book that has ever been made into a movie is as good or better – no, no, no. in fact, I won’t see a movie that was first a book I’ve read or read the book for a movie that I enjoyed. but I will tell you – and you will agree – that there are works of screen writing that do that same thing to you that a really good book does: Pulp Fiction, Casablanca. there’s a magic in that writing (in those movies) that the actors bring to life the way that my imagination breathes life into Truman Capote’s Holly Golightly or Sylvia Plath’s Esther or Herman Melville’s Ishmael. and with that said, you might re-consider the thought that “no device, no machine” will ever be able to capture that kind of magic for you.
Anna
September 13th, 2010 at 21:07
Sweet.
David Broshar
September 13th, 2010 at 21:38
Great post, Tony, and thanks for the nod to me. I feel honored that I was your entrée into the world of Tolkien. Funny you should mention Verne. I’d never read a word of Verne (although I loved the Disney version of 20,000 Leagues as a kid) until this very school year, when my 8th-grade team adopted Around the World in Eighty Days as a part of the curriculum. I’m loving it! I really enjoy Verne’s prose, even though it’s in translation. I have to put in a nod here for the single greatest author I’ve ever come across (saving Shakespeare, of course): Patrick O’Brian. He is, without a doubt, my desert island choice. The movie Master and Commander (which was quite good, actually) is based on his novels, but I’ve never read any prose like his: tight, muscular, luminous, difficult, breathtaking. I cannot recommend him highly enough, really. I’ve never been a heroin junkie, but I know how they feel now. O’Brian’s like that.
John Pender
September 13th, 2010 at 21:51
You know, I was working on a post on my own blog about this very thing. No way in hell I can top this one. You win.
There’s something magical about opening a book and reading it. I can’t explain it. I like the idea of the e-readers, but I can’t ever bring myself to actually sit down and use one.
David Baggett
September 14th, 2010 at 08:05
Well done sir! Excellent stuff and I am in agreement with your sentiments on a good ole fashioned book. I appreciate and occasionally use a Kindle, but a Kindle will never fit in with a recliner, the crackle of the fire on a chilly night and a pint of your favorite adult beverage on the table next to you.
Nice shout out to Broshar. Speaking of Broshar, Patrick O’Brian novels were introduced to me by David Kolf. I had read all the Alexander Kent novels in HS, Kolf suggested O’Brian. Who knew that Appleby East was full such vast stores of literary knowledge (snicker)?
Scott Thompson
September 14th, 2010 at 10:36
That’s a beautiful post Tony. I also like the idea of the e-reader, but there is something special about a book. Some books may be fine read on a machine, but some are too special to ever leave paper. Good writing. I can’t wait to read more.
Gayle Faires
July 7th, 2011 at 21:22
Tony, I just read this….enjoyed it very much. And, I agree….I want to hold the book in my hand, turn the pages and lose myself in the story.